People v. Croskey

Full title: The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Nathaniel CROSKEY…

Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Dec 4, 2014

123 A.D.3d 456 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)

2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 8494

996 N.Y.S.2d 201

Opinion

2014-12-4

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Nathaniel CROSKEY, Defendant Appellant.

Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Lauren Springer of counsel), for appellant. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Richard Nahas of counsel), for respondent.

FRIEDMAN

Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Lauren Springer of counsel), for appellant. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Richard Nahas of counsel), for respondent.
FRIEDMAN, J.P., ACOSTA, MOSKOWITZ, RICHTER, CLARK, JJ.

Appeals having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from judgments of the Supreme Court, New York County (Charles Solomon, J.), rendered on or about February 2, 2012,

Said appeals having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentences not excessive,

It is unanimously ordered that the judgments so appealed from be and the same are hereby affirmed.