From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Crosby

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Sep 23, 2015
131 A.D.3d 1179 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)

Opinion

2015-09-23

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Andre CROSBY, appellant.

Anthony N. Iannarelli, Jr., New York, N.Y., for appellant. David M. Hoovler, District Attorney, Middletown, N.Y. (Elizabeth L. Schulz of counsel), for respondent.


Anthony N. Iannarelli, Jr., New York, N.Y., for appellant. David M. Hoovler, District Attorney, Middletown, N.Y. (Elizabeth L. Schulz of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the County Court, Orange County (Berry, J.), imposed October 7, 2013, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant's waiver of his right to appeal was invalid ( see People v. Finnegan, 112 A.D.3d 847, 976 N.Y.S.2d 231; People v. Gil, 109 A.D.3d 484, 970 N.Y.S.2d 88) and, thus, does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claim. However, the sentence imposed was not excessive ( see People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80, 455 N.Y.S.2d 675). ENG, P.J., RIVERA, HALL, AUSTIN and COHEN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Crosby

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Sep 23, 2015
131 A.D.3d 1179 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
Case details for

People v. Crosby

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Andre CROSBY, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Sep 23, 2015

Citations

131 A.D.3d 1179 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
2015 N.Y. Slip Op. 6928
16 N.Y.S.3d 764

Citing Cases

People v. Leach

While the content of the court's advisement was correct, its timing deprived defendant of the right to know…