From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Crockett

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 22, 1999
262 A.D.2d 205 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

June 22, 1999.

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Edwin Torres, J.).


Defendant's suppression motion was properly denied. Within a minute after receiving a radio report of shots fired by two described individuals, the arresting officers responded to the designated location and found defendant and another man who were the only people in the area and who closely matched the radioed descriptions. Moreover, defendant backed away from the arresting officer and repeatedly ignored the officer's requests to stop and remove his hands from his pockets. These circumstances provided the officers with reasonable suspicion to stop and frisk defendant ( see, People v. Salaman, 71 N.Y.2d 869).

Defendant's claim regarding the court's denial of defendant's challenge for cause of a prospective alternate juror is moot because no alternate jurors participated in deliberations.

Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Mazzarelli, Lerner, Rubin and Saxe, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Crockett

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 22, 1999
262 A.D.2d 205 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

People v. Crockett

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. FREDERICK CROCKETT…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 22, 1999

Citations

262 A.D.2d 205 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
694 N.Y.S.2d 350

Citing Cases

People v. White

Since the record establishes that defendant had not exhausted all of his peremptory challenges prior to the…

People v. Haardt

Initially, to the extent that defendant contends that County Court erred in denying his challenge for cause…