From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Creedon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 17, 1984
106 A.D.2d 515 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Opinion

December 17, 1984

Appeal from the County Court, Suffolk County (Mallon, J., Ingraham, J.).


Judgments affirmed.

We have examined defendant's contentions and find them to be without merit. We note that, with respect to the requirements of section 130.16 Penal of the Penal Law, "independent corroborative evidence need not prove defendant's guilt to a moral certainty, but need simply harmonize with the victim's testimony in such a manner as to furnish the necessary connection between the defendant and the crime" ( People v. De Vyver, 89 A.D.2d 745, 747). Titone, J.P., Weinstein, Rubin and Boyers, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Creedon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 17, 1984
106 A.D.2d 515 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)
Case details for

People v. Creedon

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JOSEPH CREEDON…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 17, 1984

Citations

106 A.D.2d 515 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Citing Cases

ROE v. SENKOWSKI

None of the cases cited by Roe in either his supporting memorandum of law or reply support the proposition…

People v. Saddlemire

Even so, the testimony of the victim's friend did sufficiently corroborate the victim's version, even if…