From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Cray

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jul 6, 1993
195 A.D.2d 303 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

July 6, 1993

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Herbert Altman, J.).


The trial court properly admitted the conditional examinations. The People satisfied their obligation under CPL 660.60 (2) by filing the tapes and transcripts before the start of the trial. We also find that defendants' guilt was established beyond a reasonable doubt, the evidence showing that they systematically stole the life savings of their victims (see, People v. Antilla, 77 N.Y.2d 853; People v. Spiegel, 48 N.Y.2d 647). Defendants' larcenous intent and their victims' lack of consent is clear from the pattern of transactions. We find no merit in defendant Lucille Cray's retrospective analysis of her trial counsel's efforts (People v. Baldi, 54 N.Y.2d 137, 146).

Concur — Rosenberger, J.P., Ellerin, Kupferman, Asch and Rubin, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Cray

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jul 6, 1993
195 A.D.2d 303 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

People v. Cray

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. BENJAMIN CRAY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jul 6, 1993

Citations

195 A.D.2d 303 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
600 N.Y.S.2d 7

Citing Cases

People v. Camiola

The jury was not instructed that the victim's capacity or incapacity was an element of the offense, but only…