From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Crawford

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Apr 21, 2016
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 3078 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

04-21-2016

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Rita CRAWFORD, Defendant–Appellant.

Seymour W. James, Jr., The Legal Aid Society, New York (Paul Wiener of counsel), for appellant. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Alan Gadlin of counsel), for respondent.


Seymour W. James, Jr., The Legal Aid Society, New York (Paul Wiener of counsel), for appellant.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Alan Gadlin of counsel), for respondent.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles H. Solomon, J.), rendered June 11, 2013, convicting defendant, upon her plea of guilty, of attempted robbery in the second degree, and sentencing her, as a second felony offender, to a term of three years, unanimously affirmed.

The sentencing court properly found that it had no discretion to defer defendant's mandatory surcharge (see People v. Jones, 26 N.Y.3d 730, 27 N.Y.S.3d 431, 47 N.E.3d 710 [2016] ).

SWEENY, J.P., RENWICK, SAXE, GISCHE, KAHN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Crawford

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Apr 21, 2016
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 3078 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
Case details for

People v. Crawford

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Rita CRAWFORD…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Apr 21, 2016

Citations

2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 3078 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
28 N.Y.S.3d 604

Citing Cases

People v. Tookes

In each case the First Department held that: “The sentencing court properly found that it had no discretion…