From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Crawford

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 28, 1985
107 A.D.2d 818 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Opinion

January 28, 1985

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Owens, J.).


Judgment affirmed.

By failing to apply to the court of first instance to withdraw his guilty plea or vacate the judgment of conviction, the defendant has not preserved the sufficiency of his plea allocution for appellate review (see People v. Pellegrino, 60 N.Y.2d 636; People v. Mattocks, 100 A.D.2d 944). In any event, the record reveals that the defendant voluntarily, knowingly and intelligently entered his guilty plea ( People v. Harris, 61 N.Y.2d 9; People v. Nixon, 21 N.Y.2d 338, cert den sub nom. Robinson v New York, 393 U.S. 1067) and that a sufficient factual basis existed to sustain the conviction (see People v. Cherry, 59 A.D.2d 722). Furthermore, there is no basis on this record warranting a modification of the sentence (see People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80).

We have considered defendant's other contentions and have found them to be without merit. O'Connor, J.P., Weinstein, Lawrence and Eiber, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Crawford

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 28, 1985
107 A.D.2d 818 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)
Case details for

People v. Crawford

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. RAYMOND CRAWFORD…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 28, 1985

Citations

107 A.D.2d 818 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)