From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Cox

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Sep 30, 1997
242 A.D.2d 502 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

September 30, 1997

Appeal from Supreme Court, Bronx County (Edward Davidowitz, J.).


Since defendant failed to advance the claims he now makes before the trial court ( see, Purkett v. Elem, 514 U.S. 765), his claims are unpreserved for appellate review (see, People v Rivera, 225 A.D.2d 392, 393, lv denied 88 N.Y.2d 969). The trial court properly concluded that the race-neutral reasons offered by the prosecutor for the peremptory challenges in question were nonpretextual, in that they were based upon bona fide concerns as to residence, demeanor, and occupation ( see, People v. Wint, 237 A.D.2d 195, lv denied 89 N.Y.2d 1103). The court's findings in this regard are entitled to great deference ( People v. Hernandez, 75 N.Y.2d 350, aff'd 500 U.S. 352).

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Milonas, Wallach, Rubin and Mazzarelli, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Cox

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Sep 30, 1997
242 A.D.2d 502 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

People v. Cox

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. LARRY COX, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Sep 30, 1997

Citations

242 A.D.2d 502 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
663 N.Y.S.2d 824

Citing Cases

People v. Davis

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Joseph Fisch, J.). Since the defendant failed to make an…