From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Coston

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 24, 2000
271 A.D.2d 694 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

Argued February 14, 2000.

April 24, 2000.

Appeal by the People, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the County Court, Nassau County (Jonas, J.), dated March 24, 1999, as, upon granting their motion to reargue an order of the same court dated December 17, 1998, made after a hearing, granting those branches of the defendant's omnibus motion which were to suppress statements he made to law enforcement officials and physical evidence, adhered to the original determination.

Denis Dillon, District Attorney, Mineola, N.Y. (Judith R. Sternberg and Leigh Neren of counsel), for appellant.

Michael A. Montesano, P.C., Glen Cove, N.Y., for respondent.

LAWRENCE J. BRACKEN, J.P., CORNELIUS J. O'BRIEN, THOMAS R. SULLIVAN, DANIEL F. LUCIANO, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from.

After the police entered the defendant's bedroom with the consent of a person who shared the bedroom with him, they seized a box. In the absence of proof that the person who consented to the police entry had "common authority" over the box based on mutual use or joint access, the warrantless seizure of the box was improper (see, People v. Gonzalez, 88 N.Y.2d 289, 293 ). Furthermore, the seizure of the box may not be justified pursuant to the plain view doctrine, because the discovery by the police of the box was not inadvertent (see, e.g., People v. Peralta, 245 A.D.2d 573 ; People v. Manganaro, 176 A.D.2d 354 ).


Summaries of

People v. Coston

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 24, 2000
271 A.D.2d 694 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

People v. Coston

Case Details

Full title:The People, etc., appellant, v. Julius Coston, respondent. (Ind. No…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 24, 2000

Citations

271 A.D.2d 694 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
706 N.Y.S.2d 732

Citing Cases

People v. Loomis

Further, a homeowner's authority over the premises does not extend to a "guest's closed container (or similar…

People v. Holmes

The People presented no evidence that the mother "shared common authority' over defendant's duffel bag, based…