Opinion
2022-01272 Ind. No. 1934/18
12-13-2023
The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Duane T. COSTA, appellant.
Jonathan Rosenberg, PLLC, Brooklyn, NY, for appellant. Anne T. Donnelly, District Attorney, Mineola, NY (Jason R. Richards and Kevin King of counsel), for respondent.
Jonathan Rosenberg, PLLC, Brooklyn, NY, for appellant.
Anne T. Donnelly, District Attorney, Mineola, NY (Jason R. Richards and Kevin King of counsel), for respondent.
ANGELA G. IANNACCI, J.P., WILLIAM G. FORD, HELEN VOUTSINAS, LOURDES M. VENTURA, JJ.
DECISION & ORDER Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Patricia A. Harrington, J.), rendered January 27, 2022, convicting him of attempted murder in the first degree (four counts), criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree (three counts), and criminal use of a firearm in the first degree, after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed. The defendant's contention that the evidence was legally insufficient to support his convictions of two counts of attempted murder in the first degree and the count of criminal use of a firearm in the first degree is unpreserved for appellate review, as his general motion to dismiss the indictment at the close of the People's case was not specifically directed at the deficiencies now being argued (see CPL 470.05[2] ; People v. Hawkins, 11 N.Y.3d 484, 492, 872 N.Y.S.2d 395, 900 N.E.2d 946 ). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v. Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620, 621, 467 N.Y.S.2d 349, 454 N.E.2d 932 ), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt of these crimes beyond a reasonable doubt.
Moreover, in fulfilling our responsibility to conduct an independent review of the weight of the evidence (see CPL 470.15[5] ; People v. Danielson, 9 N.Y.3d 342, 849 N.Y.S.2d 480, 880 N.E.2d 1 ), we nevertheless accord great deference to the factfinder's opportunity to view the witnesses, hear the testimony, and observe demeanor (see People v. Mateo, 2 N.Y.3d 383, 410, 779 N.Y.S.2d 399, 811 N.E.2d 1053 ; People v. Bleakley, 69 N.Y.2d 490, 495, 515 N.Y.S.2d 761, 508 N.E.2d 672 ). Upon reviewing the record here, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v. Romero, 7 N.Y.3d 633, 826 N.Y.S.2d 163, 859 N.E.2d 902 ).
The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80, 455 N.Y.S.2d 675 ).
IANNACCI, J.P., FORD, VOUTSINAS and VENTURA, JJ., concur.