From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Cornell

Supreme Court of Michigan
Jan 30, 2001
463 Mich. 958 (Mich. 2001)

Opinion

No. 115833 and (46).

January 30, 2001.


COA: 211215, Roscommon CC: 96-003174-FH.

By order of June 20, 2000, this Court directed the prosecutor to answer the defendant's application for leave to appeal from the November 2, 1999, decision of the Court of Appeals. The answer having been filed, the application for leave to appeal is considered again, and it is GRANTED.

The issures are limited to the issues whether (1) the trial court erred in refusing to give the requested misdemeanor lesser included offense instruction, and (2) if so, whether the error was harmless. In addressing the harmless error issue, the parties shall discuss the applicability of People v Richardson, 409 Mich. 126 (1980) , People v Beach, 429 Mich. 450 (1988), People v Mosko, 441 Mich. 496 (1992), People v Lukity, 460 Mich. 484 (1999), People v Snyder, 462 Mich. 38 (2000), and People v Elston, 462 Mich. 751 (2000). The case is to be argued and submitted to the Court with Peopel v Silver, No. 117024. Court of Appeals No. 211215.


Summaries of

People v. Cornell

Supreme Court of Michigan
Jan 30, 2001
463 Mich. 958 (Mich. 2001)
Case details for

People v. Cornell

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ADAM KEITH…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan

Date published: Jan 30, 2001

Citations

463 Mich. 958 (Mich. 2001)
623 N.W.2d 242

Citing Cases

People v. Silver

Additionally, the dissent noted that the situation was not one in which the jury had a choice of some other…

People v. Haynie

The order clearly did not identify the harmless-error issue as one for review, and thus the majority’s…