From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Corbin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 14, 1997
243 A.D.2d 575 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

October 14, 1997

Appeal from the County Court, Suffolk County (Weissman, J.),


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that he should have been adjudicated a youthful offender. At sentencing, the defendant did not move to withdraw his plea or otherwise object when the court denied his motion for youthful offender treatment. As a result, the defendant has waived his right to appellate review of this issue ( see, People v. Maybeck, 157 A.D.2d 861; People v. Woods, 143 A.D.2d 1068; People v. Polansky, 125 A.D.2d 342). In any event, the sentencing court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the defendant youthful offender treatment in light of the facts and circumstances underlying the crime of which he was convicted ( see, People v. Maybeck, supra).

Rosenblatt, J.P., O'Brien, Thompson, Friedmann and Goldstein, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Corbin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 14, 1997
243 A.D.2d 575 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

People v. Corbin

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. RASHAAN CORBIN

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 14, 1997

Citations

243 A.D.2d 575 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
663 N.Y.S.2d 117

Citing Cases

People v. Huffman

The defendant's claim that she should have received youthful offender treatment is unpreserved for appellate…