From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Coombs

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 26, 1999
265 A.D.2d 249 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

October 26, 1999

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Steven Barrett, J.).


Defendant's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel would require a CPL 440.10 motion in order to expand the record (People v. Love, 57 N.Y.2d 998). On the existing record, we conclude that defendant received meaningful representation (see,People v. Benevento, 91 N.Y.2d 708, 713-714). The existing record fails to establish defendant's claim that his trial attorney misunderstood or mishandled the extreme emotional disturbance defense.

Furthermore, defendant has not shown how any other strategy would have had a greater likelihood of success.

SULLIVAN, J.P., TOM, RUBIN, SAXE and BUCKLEY, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Coombs

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 26, 1999
265 A.D.2d 249 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

People v. Coombs

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. RONALD COOMBS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 26, 1999

Citations

265 A.D.2d 249 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
696 N.Y.S.2d 817