From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Cooke

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 16, 2008
57 A.D.3d 750 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)

Opinion

No. 2007-06118.

December 16, 2008.

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Rienzi, J.), dated June 1, 2007, which, after a hearing, designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Lynn W. L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (William Kastin of counsel), for appellant.

Daniel M. Donovan, Jr., District Attorney, Staten Island, N.Y. (Morrie I. Kleinbart of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Mastro, J.P., Miller, Balkin and McCarthy, JJ. concur.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

A downward departure from the presumptive risk level recommended by the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders in the risk assessment instrument, in this case, risk level three, is warranted only upon a showing by the defendant, by clear and convincing evidence, that there were mitigating factors that were not properly taken into account by the guidelines. Since the defendant failed to make that showing, a downward departure was not warranted ( see People v Guaman, 8 AD3d 545).


Summaries of

People v. Cooke

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 16, 2008
57 A.D.3d 750 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
Case details for

People v. Cooke

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JOSEPH COOKE, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 16, 2008

Citations

57 A.D.3d 750 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 9972
868 N.Y.S.2d 909

Citing Cases

People v. Rodriguez

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying his…