From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Conwell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 9, 1985
115 A.D.2d 552 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Opinion

December 9, 1985

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kooper, J.).


Judgment affirmed.

Any prejudice to defendant from the prosecution witness's rebuttal testimony that he had been watching defendant at the time of the murder because defendant was a suspect in an unrelated burglary was vitiated by the witness's repeated statements that he subsequently learned that defendant was, in fact, not involved in that burglary.

Under the circumstances of this case, the sentence imposed was not excessive. Gibbons, J.P., Bracken, Lawrence and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Conwell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 9, 1985
115 A.D.2d 552 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)
Case details for

People v. Conwell

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ADRIAN CONWELL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 9, 1985

Citations

115 A.D.2d 552 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)