From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Contrano

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 20, 2000
274 A.D.2d 760 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

July 20, 2000.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Delaware County, rendered July 19, 1999, which revoked defendant's probation and imposed a sentence of imprisonment.

Teresa Mulliken, Delhi, for appellant.

Richard D. Northrup Jr., District Attorney, Delhi, for respondent.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Spain, Graffeo, Mugglin and Lahtinen, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Defendant was sentenced to five years' probation following her conviction for two drug-related offenses. Thereafter, defendant admitted to violating a term of her probation. As a result, defendant's probation was revoked and she was resentenced to a nine-month term of imprisonment on July 19, 1999. Defendant appeals. Inasmuch as defendant has completed the sentence imposed, her appeal has been rendered moot (see, People v. Hamilton, 214 A.D.2d 783; People v. Anderson, 197 A.D.2d 749, lv denied 82 N.Y.2d 921). Furthermore, because there is no "recurring issue of public interest which would otherwise escape appellate review, dismissal is appropriate" (People v. Anderson, supra).

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, as moot.


Summaries of

People v. Contrano

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 20, 2000
274 A.D.2d 760 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

People v. Contrano

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JAMIE CONTRANO…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jul 20, 2000

Citations

274 A.D.2d 760 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
711 N.Y.S.2d 923

Citing Cases

People v. Parente

year upon a finding, based on his admission, that he violated the conditions of his probation imposed upon…

People v. Young

In our view, the court's Sandoval compromise appropriately allowed the People to question defendant about…