Summary
In People v. Conrad (44 N.Y.2d 863, 864, affg on opn below 93 Misc.2d 655, 655-656 [Monroe County Ct 1976]), the Court of Appeals held that CPL 30.30 was not violated when the People were prevented from timely answering ready for trial by the trial court's negligent setting of the trial date beyond the 30.30 time limit. Of course, Conrad does not dispose of the instant case, since the 30.30 time limit had not expired in the instant case at the time of the arraignment set by the Criminal Court Clerk.
Summary of this case from People v. WaltonOpinion
Argued April 28, 1978
Decided May 31, 1978
Appeal from the Monroe County Court, HYMAN T. MAAS, J., DAVID A. BROWN, J.
Dan M. Walters for appellant.
Lawrence T. Kurlander, District Attorney (Stephen M. Brent of counsel), for respondent.
Order affirmed on the opinion by Monroe County Judge HYMAN T. MAAS.
Concur: Chief Judge BREITEL and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and COOKE.