From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Confino

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Dept., 9th & 10th Judicial Districts
Dec 12, 2016
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 95227 (N.Y. App. Term 2016)

Opinion

Motion No: 2015-02274 NC

12-12-2016

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Esther Confino, Appellant.


BRUCE E. TOLBERT

JERRY GARGUILO, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION

Motion by respondent on an appeal from a judgment of the District Court of Nassau County, Nassau County Traffic and Parking Violations Agency, entered August 20, 2015, and from an order of the same court entered September 1, 2015, for an enlargement of time to serve and file a respondent's brief.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is

ORDERED that the motion is granted and respondent's time to serve and file a respondent's brief is enlarged to 30 days from the date of this decision and order on motion; and it is further,

ORDERED that no further applications for an enlargement of time to serve and file a respondent's brief shall be entertained.

ENTER:

Paul Kenny

Chief Clerk


Summaries of

People v. Confino

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Dept., 9th & 10th Judicial Districts
Dec 12, 2016
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 95227 (N.Y. App. Term 2016)
Case details for

People v. Confino

Case Details

Full title:The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Esther Confino…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Dept., 9th & 10th Judicial Districts

Date published: Dec 12, 2016

Citations

2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 95227 (N.Y. App. Term 2016)
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 95228
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 95230
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 95226