From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Colon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 5, 1994
210 A.D.2d 247 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

December 5, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kay, J.).


Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant's contention that the sentencing court violated CPL 380.50 (1) by failing to provide the defendant, defense counsel, and the prosecutor with the opportunity to make statements is unpreserved for review (see, People v Green, 54 N.Y.2d 878, 880; People v White, 158 A.D.2d 565). In any event, the record indicates that the sentencing court substantially complied with the requirements of the statute (see, People v McClain, 35 N.Y.2d 483, 491-492, cert denied sub nom. Taylor v New York, 423 U.S. 852). Mangano, P.J., Rosenblatt, Miller, Copertino and Krausman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Colon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 5, 1994
210 A.D.2d 247 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

People v. Colon

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. NINA COLON, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 5, 1994

Citations

210 A.D.2d 247 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
620 N.Y.S.2d 253

Citing Cases

People v. Sean McCant

The defendant's claim that he was deprived of an opportunity to address the County Court at the time of his…

People v. Lucien Chin [2d Dept 1-12-2010

The defendant's contention that he was not afforded an opportunity to address the court at the time of his…