From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Collins

Court of Appeals of California, Sixth Appellate District.
Jul 18, 2003
H025371 (Cal. Ct. App. Jul. 18, 2003)

Opinion

H025371.

7-18-2003

THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. CARL ANTHONY COLLINS, Defendant and Appellant.


Defendant, Carl Anthony Collins appeals from a judgment entered after he pleaded guilty to possession of a controlled substance. (Health & Saf. Code, § 11350, subd. (a).) The trial court initially suspended imposition of sentence and placed defendant on probation pursuant to Proposition 36. However, when defendant admitted multiple probation violations, including two instances of violation of Penal Code section 148, subdivision (a)(1) and Health and Safety Code section 11364, the court denied further Proposition 36 probation and imposed the midterm prison sentence of two years. Defendant filed a timely notice of appeal and we appointed counsel to represent defendant in this court.

Appointed counsel filed an opening brief which states the case and the facts but raises no specific issues. We notified defendant of his right to submit written argument in his own behalf within 30 days. We received a handwritten letter from the defendant dated February 26, 2003, raising several issues.

Pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 158 Cal. Rptr. 839, 600 P.2d 1071, we have reviewed the entire record and have concluded that there is no arguable issue on appeal.

DISPOSITION

The judgment is affirmed.

WE CONCUR: PREMO, J., and ELIA, J.


Summaries of

People v. Collins

Court of Appeals of California, Sixth Appellate District.
Jul 18, 2003
H025371 (Cal. Ct. App. Jul. 18, 2003)
Case details for

People v. Collins

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. CARL ANTHONY COLLINS, Defendant…

Court:Court of Appeals of California, Sixth Appellate District.

Date published: Jul 18, 2003

Citations

H025371 (Cal. Ct. App. Jul. 18, 2003)