From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Collins

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 5, 2001
280 A.D.2d 486 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

Submitted January 4, 2001.

February 5, 2001.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (DeRosa, J.), rendered June 17, 1999, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ethel P. Ross, Rye, N.Y., for appellant.

Francis D. Phillips II, District Attorney, Goshen, N.Y. (David R. Huey of counsel), for respondent.

Before: FRED T. SANTUCCI, J.P., SONDRA MILLER, WILLIAM D. FRIEDMANN, GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that during the course of jury selection, the court improperly allowed the prosecutor to exercise a race-based peremptory challenge in violation of Batson v. Kentucky ( 476 U.S. 79). Appellate review of this issue was forfeited upon the defendant's plea of guilty (see, People v. Hansen, 95 N.Y.2d 227, 231; People v. Green, 75 N.Y.2d 902). Furthermore, as part of his plea bargain, the defendant voluntarily waived appellate review of this issue and his contention that the court erred in denying his motion to suppress physical evidence (see, People v. Kemp, 94 N.Y.2d 831).


Summaries of

People v. Collins

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 5, 2001
280 A.D.2d 486 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

People v. Collins

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, ETC., RESPONDENT, v. RENFORD COLLINS, APPELLANT. (IND. NO…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 5, 2001

Citations

280 A.D.2d 486 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
719 N.Y.S.2d 899

Citing Cases

People v. Sirico

nsen, 95 N.Y.2d at 230, 715 N.Y.S.2d 369, 738 N.E.2d 773). “This is so because a defendant's ‘conviction…

People v. Sirico

, 95 N.Y.2d at 230, 715 N.Y.S.2d 369, 738 N.E.2d 773 ). “This is so because a defendant's ‘conviction rests…