From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Collier

Michigan Court of Appeals
Mar 28, 1969
16 Mich. App. 695 (Mich. Ct. App. 1969)

Opinion

Docket No. 5,283.

Decided March 28, 1969.

Appeal from Saginaw, Eugene Snow Huff, J. Submitted Division 3 March 11, 1969, at Grand Rapids. (Docket No. 5,283.) Decided March 28, 1969.

Paul Frederick Collier was convicted of attempted breaking and entering. Defendant appeals. Affirmed.

Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General, Robert A. Derengoski, Solicitor General, George E. Thick, II, Prosecuting Attorney, and Bruce J. Scorsone, Chief Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for the people.

Merritt R. Jones, for defendant.

BEFORE: McGREGOR, P.J. and R.B. BURNS and DANHOF, JJ.


Defendant, convicted of attempted breaking and entering, MCLA §§ 750.92, 750.110 (Stat Ann 1962 Rev § 28.287 and 1968 Cum Supp § 28.305), contends the lower court incorrectly denied defense counsel's motion for a continuance. Defendant avers an important witness was absent from the trial jurisdiction, and argues the court should have allowed a continuance until the witness returned to testify.

Continuances are discretionary. The movant must show both materiality of the absent witness's testimony and a diligent effort to secure the witness's appearance. GCR 1963, 503.2. Defendant did not specify the materiality of the absent witness's testimony until filing an appellate brief. Furthermore, he did not attempt to subpoena the witness until the day before trial. Thus, defendant did not comply with the court rule guidelines, and the court correctly denied the continuance motion.

Conviction affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. Collier

Michigan Court of Appeals
Mar 28, 1969
16 Mich. App. 695 (Mich. Ct. App. 1969)
Case details for

People v. Collier

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE v. COLLIER

Court:Michigan Court of Appeals

Date published: Mar 28, 1969

Citations

16 Mich. App. 695 (Mich. Ct. App. 1969)
168 N.W.2d 623

Citing Cases

People v. Taylor

As Knox held, the failure to attempt to secure the attendance of the witness by subpoena is such lack of…

People v. McClendon

Under the circumstances a refusal to grant a continuance was not an abuse of discretion. People v. Collier…