From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Collier

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 18, 1996
226 A.D.2d 923 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

April 18, 1996

Appeal from the County Court of Sullivan County (Kane, J.).


Shortly before the commencement of a trial on an indictment charging defendant with criminal possession of a controlled substance in the first degree and two other counts, defendant pleaded guilty to a reduced charge of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree in satisfaction of the entire indictment. The plea was entered with the express understanding that defendant would receive the shortest legally permissible sentence, a prison term of six years to life, and accepted only upon condition that defendant waive her right to appeal. Having been sentenced pursuant to the plea bargain, defendant now appeals, contending that County Court erred in denying her motion to suppress evidence obtained as the result of an allegedly illegal stop and search of the vehicle in which she was a passenger.

The record provides no basis for a finding that defendant's waiver of her right to appeal was not knowingly and intelligently made ( see, People v. Scott, 222 A.D.2d 958) and we are not persuaded that a defendant's right to appeal the denial of a motion to suppress tangible evidence will survive a valid waiver of appeal ( see, People v. Seaberg, 74 N.Y.2d 1, 7; People v Williams, 36 N.Y.2d 829, cert denied 423 U.S. 873; People v Scott, supra). Under the circumstances, the waiver of defendant's right to appeal will be enforced.

Cardona, P.J., White, Casey and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. Collier

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 18, 1996
226 A.D.2d 923 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

People v. Collier

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CYNTHIA COLLIER…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Apr 18, 1996

Citations

226 A.D.2d 923 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
641 N.Y.S.2d 181

Citing Cases

People v. Vasquez

On appeal, defendant argues that the sentence is harsh and excessive because she was merely a courier for the…

People v. Collier

We affirm. In our view, defendant knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently waived her right to appeal ( see,…