From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Coles

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 2, 1997
240 A.D.2d 419 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

June 2, 1997

Appeal from the County Court, Suffolk County (Jones, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's claim that his guilty plea was coerced is not preserved for appellate review. The defendant did not move to vacate his guilty plea, nor did he otherwise raise this issue before the County Court ( see, People v. Pellegrino, 60 N.Y.2d 636; People v. Bartlett, 215 A.D.2d 489). In any event, the record of the plea proceedings establishes that the defendant knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently pleaded guilty ( see, People v. Harris, 61 N.Y.2d 9).

The defendant's claim that he received ineffective assistance of counsel is without merit. The record demonstrates that trial counsel rendered meaningful representation to the defendant at all stages of the proceedings ( People v. Hobot, 84 N.Y.2d 1021; People v. Baldi, 54 N.Y.2d 137).

Finally, the defendant may not now be heard to challenge the negotiated sentence which the court imposed ( see, People v Kazepis, 101 A.D.2d 816). In any event, under the circumstances of this case, the sentence imposed was neither harsh nor excessive ( see, People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80).

Miller, J.P., Thompson, Joy and Luciano, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Coles

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 2, 1997
240 A.D.2d 419 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

People v. Coles

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. LAMONT COLES, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 2, 1997

Citations

240 A.D.2d 419 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
658 N.Y.S.2d 1005

Citing Cases

People v. Williams

The defendant's contention that his plea of guilty was coerced is unpreserved for appellate review. The…

People v. Whitaker

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed. The defendant's contention that his plea was coerced is unpreserved…