From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Coleman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 29, 1990
157 A.D.2d 845 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

January 29, 1990

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Schwartzwald, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law, by vacating the sentence imposed; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for a hearing and new determination as to whether the defendant is a second felony offender, and for resentencing.

The defendant pleaded guilty to one count of manslaughter in the first degree in satisfaction of an indictment which charged him with intentional murder, felony murder, and several other, lesser crimes. The defendant admitted that he and the accomplice intended to rob the victim, Vernon Green. The accomplice announced the robbery and demanded money. The defendant had a rifle in his hand and was a partner in the robbery. During the course of the robbery, the accomplice shot the victim, who died.

We find that the plea allocution was proper, as it was sufficient to establish the elements necessary to sustain a conviction of felony murder (see, People v. White, 134 A.D.2d 385 ). Moreover, "it has been held that '[a] bargained guilty plea to a lesser crime makes unnecessary a factual basis for the particular crime confessed' (see, People v. Clairborne, 29 N.Y.2d 950, 951, quoted in People v. Kazmarick, 52 N.Y.2d 322, 326; People v. Colon, 77 A.D.2d 370; People v. Du Bray, 76 A.D.2d 976)" (People v. Amerson, 91 A.D.2d 1204).

However, we find that the court improperly adjudicated the defendant to be a second felony offender. The court read the minutes of the defendant's guilty plea to a prior felony into the record. However, it does not appear that those minutes complied with the requirements of CPLR 4540 (a) and (b). Further, no attestation or certification of other documents relied upon by the court was ever shown (see, People v. Allah, 66 A.D.2d 665). The People, however, should have the opportunity to overcome the technical shortcomings of such proof at a new hearing (see, People v. Hines, 90 A.D.2d 621; People v. Gonzalez, 64 A.D.2d 534; People v. Dugas, 35 A.D.2d 732). Mollen, P.J., Brown, Kunzeman and Eiber, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Coleman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 29, 1990
157 A.D.2d 845 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

People v. Coleman

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. COLE COLEMAN, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 29, 1990

Citations

157 A.D.2d 845 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
550 N.Y.S.2d 425