From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Cole

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 7, 1991
174 A.D.2d 970 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

June 7, 1991

Appeal from the Monroe County Court, Maloy, J.

Present — Dillon, P.J., Denman, Lawton, Lowery and Davis, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant contends that his statutory and constitutional right to be present at all critical stages of his trial was violated when the court, in the presence of counsel but in defendant's absence, considered defendant's Sandoval motion in chambers. The issue is not preserved for appellate review, and absent a showing of prejudice, we decline to reach it in the interest of justice (see, People v Dunbar, 172 A.D.2d 1006; People v Favor, 172 A.D.2d 1052).

We have reviewed defendant's remaining contention and find it to be without merit.


Summaries of

People v. Cole

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 7, 1991
174 A.D.2d 970 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

People v. Cole

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JOHN W. COLE, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jun 7, 1991

Citations

174 A.D.2d 970 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
572 N.Y.S.2d 129

Citing Cases

People v. Favor

The Second Department also demonstrated some uncertainty about the correct resolution of the issue (compare,…

People v. Alexander

Given the numerous conflicts between the testimony of an eyewitness and that of defendant, the jury's…