From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Cofresi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jul 22, 1982
89 A.D.2d 544 (N.Y. App. Div. 1982)

Opinion

July 22, 1982


Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Mazur, J.), entered March 3, 1981, granting defendants' motion to suppress physical evidence, unanimously reversed, on the law, the motion to suppress is denied and the indictment is reinstated. As defendants now concede, in 1980 the United States Supreme Court, in United States v. Salvucci ( 448 U.S. 83), and Rawlings v Kentucky ( 448 U.S. 98), abolished the "automatic standing" doctrine and it was thus error for the trial court to entertain the motion to suppress the physical evidence seized at the time of their arrest. (See, e.g., People v. Buckley, 81 A.D.2d 511.) Since the Court of Appeals has recently rejected a claim that the doctrine is still viable under the Constitution of this State ( People v. Ponder, 54 N.Y.2d 160), we must reverse the order appealed from and reinstate the indictment. There is no need for another hearing on standing. The record shows that the police officers acted reasonably under the circumstances and did not violate any rights of the defendants.

Concur — Kupferman, J.P., Sandler, Carro, Lupiano and Milonas, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Cofresi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jul 22, 1982
89 A.D.2d 544 (N.Y. App. Div. 1982)
Case details for

People v. Cofresi

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Appellant, v. ALBERTO COFRESI, MIGUEL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jul 22, 1982

Citations

89 A.D.2d 544 (N.Y. App. Div. 1982)