Opinion
June 22, 1992
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Cooperman, J.).
Ordered that the judgment and the amended judgment are affirmed.
We disagree with the defendant's contention that his guilt under Indictment No. 770/89 was not proven beyond a reasonable doubt. Viewing the evidence adduced at trial in the light most favorable to the People (see, People v. Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to support the conviction. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15).
Since the defendant's appeal from the amended judgment is predicated on his claim that the judgment under Indictment No. 770/89 should be reversed, we also affirm the amended judgment. Sullivan, J.P., Lawrence, Ritter and Santucci, JJ., concur.