From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Clemons

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Dec 2, 2022
981 N.W.2d 724 (Mich. 2022)

Opinion

SC: 162597 COA: 347225

12-02-2022

PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Willie Terrell CLEMONS, Defendant-Appellant.


Order

By order of December 1, 2021, the application for leave to appeal the December 17, 2020 judgment of the Court of Appeals was held in abeyance pending the decision in People v Taylor (Docket No. 154994 ). On order of the Court, the case having been decided on July 28, 2022, 510 Mich ––––, ––– N.W.2d ––––, 2022 WL 3008301 (2022), the application is again considered. Pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE in part the judgment of the Court of Appeals, VACATE the sentence of the Kent Circuit Court, and REMAND this case to the trial court for resentencing. A court may not impose a sentence of life without parole on a defendant who was under 18 years of age at the time of his crime unless the prosecution has overcome its burden to rebut the presumption, by clear and convincing evidence , that life without parole is a disproportionate sentence. Taylor , supra . Because the sentencing court in this case did not apply the "clear and convincing" standard, the defendant is entitled to resentencing. Id . In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the remaining questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

Viviano, J. (concurring in part and dissenting in part.)

For the reasons stated in my dissent in People v Taylor , 510 Mich ––––, ––– N.W.2d ––––, 2022 WL 3008301 (2022) (Docket No. 154994), I do not believe there is a presumption that life without parole is a disproportionate sentence or that the prosecution is required to rebut this presumption in order for a court to impose a sentence of life without parole on a defendant who was under the age of 18 at the time of his crime. Therefore, I do not believe defendant is entitled to resentencing. I respectfully dissent from the order vacating in part the Court of Appeals’ judgment, vacating defendant's sentence, and remanding for resentencing; I concur in the denial of leave in all other respects.


Summaries of

People v. Clemons

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Dec 2, 2022
981 N.W.2d 724 (Mich. 2022)
Case details for

People v. Clemons

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Willie Terrell…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan.

Date published: Dec 2, 2022

Citations

981 N.W.2d 724 (Mich. 2022)