From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Clark

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 4, 1980
74 A.D.2d 581 (N.Y. App. Div. 1980)

Opinion

February 4, 1980


Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, rendered November 15, 1975, convicting him of robbery in the first degree and two counts of robbery in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment affirmed. The introduction of impeachment evidence that, at the time of defendant's arrest, he failed to relate to the arresting officer the exculpatory version of events to which he testified at trial, was error (see Doyle v. Ohio, 426 U.S. 610). However, in light of the overwhelming evidence of defendant's guilt, defense counsel's failure to make timely objections, and the court's curative instructions given both after the evidence in question was admitted and in its final charge, we find this error to be harmless beyond a reasonable doubt (see People v. Crimmins, 36 N.Y.2d 230; cf. People v. Conyers, 49 N.Y.2d 174). Mollen, P.J., Hopkins, Titone and Mangano, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Clark

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 4, 1980
74 A.D.2d 581 (N.Y. App. Div. 1980)
Case details for

People v. Clark

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JOHN CLARK, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 4, 1980

Citations

74 A.D.2d 581 (N.Y. App. Div. 1980)

Citing Cases

People v. Lewis

Furthermore, when viewed against the overwhelming evidence of defendant's guilt this error was harmless…

Campanale v. Harris

Notably, the New York courts have applied Doyle on direct appeal to convictions entered prior to the Doyle…