From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Clark

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 7, 1994
201 A.D.2d 493 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

February 7, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Marrus, J.).,


Ordered the judgment is affirmed.

Upon our review of the record, we conclude that the defendant's plea was both factually sufficient and was entered into knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily (see, People v Harris, 61 N.Y.2d 9). In addition, there is no basis to the defendant's claim that counsel failed to provide meaningful representation (see, People v. Jackson, 70 N.Y.2d 768). Accordingly, the court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the defendant's application to withdraw his plea of guilty (see, CPL 220.60; People v. Cance, 155 A.D.2d 764; People v. Howard, 138 A.D.2d 525). Bracken, J.P., Miller, Copertino, Santucci and Altman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Clark

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 7, 1994
201 A.D.2d 493 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

People v. Clark

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. KEVIN CLARK, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 7, 1994

Citations

201 A.D.2d 493 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
609 N.Y.S.2d 798

Citing Cases

People v. Clark

January 31, 2001. Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of…