From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Clark

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 1, 1999
263 A.D.2d 551 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

July 1, 1999

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Broome County (Smith, J.), rendered July 28, 1998, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree.

Robert M. O'Leary, Public Defender (William L. Brown of counsel), Binghamton, for appellant.

Gerald F. Mollen, District Attorney (Joseph F. Romani of counsel), Binghamton, for respondent.

Before: CARDONA, P.J., MIKOLL, CREW III, SPAIN and GRAFFEO, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Pursuant to a negotiated plea bargain, defendant pleaded guilty to a reduced charge of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree in satisfaction of two indictments and was sentenced as a second felony offender to a term 4 to 8 years in prison. Defendant now argues that this sentence was harsh and excessive principally due to his troubled childhood. Nevertheless, a sentence within permissible statutory ranges will not be disturbed unless extraordinary circumstances exist warranting a modification (see, People v. Dolphy, 257 A.D.2d 681, 684-685, 685 N.Y.S.2d 485, 489, lv denied 93 N.Y.2d 872 [Mar. 19, 1999]). Here, given defendant's criminal record and the details contained in the record, we find no reason to disturb the negotiated sentence in the interest of justice (see,id.).

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. Clark

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 1, 1999
263 A.D.2d 551 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

People v. Clark

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DAVID A. CLARK…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jul 1, 1999

Citations

263 A.D.2d 551 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
692 N.Y.S.2d 777

Citing Cases

People v. Vazquez

In that regard, we note that defendant was accorded a significant measure of leniency when County Court…