From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Clark

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 3, 1995
217 A.D.2d 555 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

July 3, 1995

Appeal from the County Court, Westchester County (Lange, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The verdict sheet that was submitted to the jury was proper. It contained no reference to any of the elements of the crimes charged and merely instructed the jury not to consider a lesser-included offense unless the defendant was found not guilty of the charged offense ( see, People v. Cole, 85 N.Y.2d 990; People v. Daughtry, 202 A.D.2d 686; People v. Vargas, 199 A.D.2d 291, 292; see also, People v. Harrison, 85 N.Y.2d 891). There was no risk that the deliberative process or the "ultimate guilt determination" of the jury was affected by the verdict sheet ( People v. Duncan, 206 A.D.2d 541; see, People v. Andujar, 202 A.D.2d 316; cf., People v. Sotomayer, 79 N.Y.2d 1029; People v Taylor, 76 N.Y.2d 873).

The defendant's other contention is without merit. Rosenblatt, J.P., Miller, Thompson and Santucci, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Clark

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 3, 1995
217 A.D.2d 555 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

People v. Clark

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. WILLIAM CLARK…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 3, 1995

Citations

217 A.D.2d 555 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
629 N.Y.S.2d 79

Citing Cases

People v. Cardenas

Moreover, the verdict sheet that was submitted to the jury was proper. It contained no references to any of…

People v. Bens

Ordered that the application is denied. The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the…