From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Cintron

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 29, 1993
191 A.D.2d 705 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

March 29, 1993

Appeal from the County Court, Suffolk County (Tisch, J.).


Ordered that the amended sentence is reversed, on the law and as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, and the matter is remitted to the County Court, Suffolk County, for resentencing in accordance herewith.

Absent the imposition of the minimum sentence or an express waiver as part of a negotiated guilty plea, a court which is about to impose a sentence based upon the defendant's violation of probation imposed under an earlier sentence must obtain and consider an updated presentence report (see, People v. Simpson, 179 A.D.2d 831). Because the court did not have before it an updated presentence report or its functional equivalent at the time it imposed the amended sentence and the defendant did not expressly waive the report, the matter must be remitted to the County Court, Suffolk County for resentencing (see, People v Roman, 153 A.D.2d 594). Thompson, J.P., Balletta, Rosenblatt and Eiber, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Cintron

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 29, 1993
191 A.D.2d 705 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

People v. Cintron

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. GLENDA CINTRON…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 29, 1993

Citations

191 A.D.2d 705 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
595 N.Y.S.2d 513

Citing Cases

People v. Thompson

Ordered that the amended sentence is reversed, on the law, and the matter is remitted to the County Court,…

People v. Dorino

Notwithstanding that certain limited information was disclosed to the sentencing court during the hearing on…