From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Churby

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 21, 2000
277 A.D.2d 393 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

Submitted October 25, 2000.

November 21, 2000.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (Pano Z. Patsalos, J.), rendered September 9, 1998, convicting him of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Dennis P. Portararo, Middletown, N.Y., for appellant.

Francis D. Phillips II, District Attorney, Goshen, N.Y. (David R. Huey of counsel), for respondent.

Before: GUY JAMES MANGANO, P.J., SONDRA MILLER, LEO F. McGINITY, DANIEL F. LUCIANO, NANCY E. SMITH, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention that the court improperly imposed a greater sentence than what had been promised is not preserved for appellate review, as he neither objected to the sentence on that ground nor moved to vacate his plea (see, People v. Wilson, 257 A.D.2d 674; People v. Gayle, 224 A.D.2d 710). In addition, since the defendant has been released from incarceration, rendering his claim largely academic, we decline to review it in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction.


Summaries of

People v. Churby

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 21, 2000
277 A.D.2d 393 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

People v. Churby

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, ETC., RESPONDENT, v. ANDREW E. CHURBY, APPELLANT

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 21, 2000

Citations

277 A.D.2d 393 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
716 N.Y.S.2d 333

Citing Cases

People v. Rooney

The defendant contends that he complied with the condition of the plea agreement which required him to…

People v. Owens

The defendant's waiver of his right to appeal does not preclude review of his contention that the sentencing…