From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Christian

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 9, 2001
287 A.D.2d 273 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

October 9, 2001.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (William Leibovitz, J. at plea; Renee White, J. at sentence), rendered August 13, 1997, convicting defendant of robbery in the third degree and criminal contempt in the first degree, and sentencing him to concurrent terms of 1 to 3 years, unanimously affirmed.

Suzanne M. Herbert, for respondent.

Laura Boyd, for defendant-appellant.

Before: Sullivan, P.J., Nardelli, Williams, Mazzarelli, JJ.


Since defendant failed to move to withdraw his guilty plea or vacate his conviction, his challenge to his factual allocution is unpreserved and we decline to review it in the interest of justice (see, People v. Toxey, 86 N.Y.2d 725). Were we to review this claim, we would find that the court's careful factual allocution clearly established defendant's guilt and that nothing in defendant's remarks suggested a viable justification defense.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

People v. Christian

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 9, 2001
287 A.D.2d 273 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

People v. Christian

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. O'HARA CHRISTIAN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 9, 2001

Citations

287 A.D.2d 273 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
730 N.Y.S.2d 858

Citing Cases

People v. Ortiz

Nor did the defendant make any statement during the plea proceeding to negate an essential element of the…

People v. Gomez

The defendant made no statement to negate an essential element of the crime or suggest a viable defense so as…