From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Christensen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 9, 1993
199 A.D.2d 649 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

December 9, 1993

Appeal from the County Court of Chemung County (Danaher, Jr., J.).


Under the circumstances of this case, we find no reason to disturb County Court's grant of restitution to the victim of the crime. Further, because defendant has already served the one-year sentence imposed by County Court, the issue of whether it was harsh or excessive has been rendered moot. Even if the issue of the severity of the sentence was properly before us, we would nevertheless find defendant's arguments to be without merit.

Weiss, P.J., Crew III, Cardona, White and Casey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. Christensen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 9, 1993
199 A.D.2d 649 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

People v. Christensen

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. MICHAEL S…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Dec 9, 1993

Citations

199 A.D.2d 649 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
605 N.Y.S.2d 976

Citing Cases

People v. Hart

Additionally, at the time the presentence report was prepared, the defendant had a total of six pending…

People v. Faulkner

We disagree. Moreover, inasmuch as defendant has since completed this jail term, the argument is moot (see,…