From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Chri. Wright

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 30, 2010
79 A.D.3d 1789 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)

Opinion

No. KA 09-02175.

December 30, 2010.

Appeal from a judgment of the Wayne County Court (John B. Nesbitt, J.), rendered August 27, 2009. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of grand larceny in the third degree.

TYSON BLUE, MACEDON, FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

RICHARD M. HEALY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, LYONS (JACQUELINE MCCORMICK OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Before: Martoche, J.P., Centra, Fahey, Lindley and Sconiers, JJ.


It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him, upon his plea of guilty, of grand larceny in the third degree (Penal Law former § 155.35), defendant contends that County Court erred in failing to conduct a restitution hearing. Defendant failed to preserve that contention for our review "inasmuch as he failed to object to the amount of restitution at sentencing or to request a hearing with respect thereto" ( People v Jorge N.T., 70 AD3d 1456, 1457, lv denied 14 NY3d 889; see People v Marvin, 68 AD3d 1729, lv denied 14 NY3d 842). Furthermore, defendant waived that contention because he expressly consented to the amount of restitution imposed ( see People v Brown, 70 AD3d 1378; People v Vogel, 20 AD3d 865, appeal dismissed 6 NY3d 728). The sentence is not unduly harsh or severe.


Summaries of

People v. Chri. Wright

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 30, 2010
79 A.D.3d 1789 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
Case details for

People v. Chri. Wright

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CHRISTOPHER WRIGHT…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Dec 30, 2010

Citations

79 A.D.3d 1789 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 9788
913 N.Y.S.2d 603

Citing Cases

People v. Faso

In any event, that challenge is without merit inasmuch as the plea allocution was not rendered factually…

People v. Butler

With respect to appeal No. 2, we conclude that defendant failed to preserve for our review her contention…