From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Chisolm

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jul 3, 1997
241 A.D.2d 346 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

July 3, 1997

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Renee White, J.).


Defendant's challenges to the prosecutor's summation are unpreserved ( People v. Medina, 53 N.Y.2d 951, 952), and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review defendant's claims, we would find that the challenged remarks were fair comments, as they were arguments readily inferable from the evidence, and were in direct response to defense counsel's summation ( People v. Shaw, 228 A.D.2d 291).

Concur — Milonas, J. P., Nardelli, Williams, Mazzarelli and Andrias, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Chisolm

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jul 3, 1997
241 A.D.2d 346 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

People v. Chisolm

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CHARLES CHISOLM…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jul 3, 1997

Citations

241 A.D.2d 346 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
660 N.Y.S.2d 976

Citing Cases

Chisolm v. Headley

( See Tr. at 189-94.) The First Department affirmed Chisolm's conviction, holding that his challenge to the…