From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Cheung

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 5, 1998
255 A.D.2d 102 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

November 5, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Franklin Weissberg, J.).


A review of the lineup photos confirms the court's determination that the lineups conducted in this case were not unduly suggestive. In each lineup, differences in height and weight between defendant and the fillers were minimized by the seating of all participants, with the added step of covering the torsos of all participants in the second lineup, and although there were differences in age between defendant and the fillers, all participants appeared sufficiently similar so that there was no substantial likelihood that defendant would be singled out for identification (People v. Edmonds, 223 A.D.2d 455, lv denied 88 N.Y.2d 984).

Concur — Lerner, P. J., Sullivan, Rosenberger, Ellerin and Rubin, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Cheung

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 5, 1998
255 A.D.2d 102 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

People v. Cheung

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. RONALD CHEUNG…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 5, 1998

Citations

255 A.D.2d 102 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
683 N.Y.S.2d 470

Citing Cases

Roldan v. Artuz

d weight of the participants, much of the difference was eliminated by the fact that the subjects were…

People v. Tocci

Thus, contrary to the defendant's contention, there was probable cause to arrest him and lack of probable…