From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Cherry

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 12, 2009
60 A.D.3d 484 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

Opinion

Nos. 45, 46.

March 12, 2009.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Eduardo Padro, J.), entered on or about February 15, 2007, which adjudicated defendant a level three offender under the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Steven Banks, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Karen M. Kalikow of counsel), for appellant.

Robert M. Morgenthau, District Attorney, New York (Malancha Chanda of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Andrias, J.P., Saxe, Acosta and Renwick, JJ.


The record supports the court's discretionary upward departure to a level three sex offender adjudication. There was clear and convincing evidence of factors, not adequately accounted for in the risk assessment instrument, demonstrating that defendant has a high risk of reoffending see e.g. People v O'Flaherty, 23 AD3d 237, lv denied 6 NY3d 705).


Summaries of

People v. Cherry

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 12, 2009
60 A.D.3d 484 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
Case details for

People v. Cherry

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. NATHANIEL CHERRY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 12, 2009

Citations

60 A.D.3d 484 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 1841
873 N.Y.S.2d 909

Citing Cases

People v. Lyons

For example, although the People point out that the defendant placed a knife against the victim's throat and…

People v. Diaz

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements. At the hearing conducted pursuant to the…