From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Chatmon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 25, 2006
31 A.D.3d 781 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)

Opinion

2004-08416.

July 25, 2006.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Walker, J.), rendered September 15, 2004, convicting him of assault in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Before: Luciano, J.P., Rivera, Lifson and Covello, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's argument that the admission of certain hearsay testimony from the complainant's wife and two police officers constituted improper bolstering is unpreserved for appellate review ( see People v Wilson, 295 AD2d 545, 546; People v Smalls, 293 AD2d 500, 501). In any event, the admission of the testimony did not constitute impermissible bolstering as the testimony was admissible for relevant, nonhearsay purposes ( see People v Smalls, supra; People v Farrell, 228 AD2d 693, 694).

The defendant's contentions raised in Points I and IV, and her contention in Point V that the prosecutor's summation shifted the burden of proof, are without merit, and his remaining contentions are unpreserved for appellate review.


Summaries of

People v. Chatmon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 25, 2006
31 A.D.3d 781 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
Case details for

People v. Chatmon

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. WILLIE CHATMON…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 25, 2006

Citations

31 A.D.3d 781 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 5983
818 N.Y.S.2d 481

Citing Cases

People v. Williams

In any event, the defendant's contention with respect to the police officer's testimony is without merit.…

People v. Williams

In any event, the defendant's contention with respect to the police officer's testimony is without merit.…