Opinion
February 19, 1991
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Owens, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant failed to state a specific ground to support his contention that the court marshaled the evidence in a biased and unbalanced manner. Consequently, we find that he did not preserve the issue for appellate review, and we decline to review it in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction (see, People v Williams, 168 A.D.2d 694; People v Udzinski, 146 A.D.2d 245, 250; People v McDonald, 144 A.D.2d 701, 702; People v Earley, 118 A.D.2d 868). Kooper, J.P., Sullivan, Miller and O'Brien, JJ., concur.