From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Charles

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Oct 9, 2013
110 A.D.3d 824 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)

Opinion

2013-10-9

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Bobby CHARLES, appellant.

Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Mark W. Vorkink of counsel), for appellant. Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (John M. Castellano and Daniel Bresnahan of counsel; Julaine Gallo on the brief), for respondent.


Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Mark W. Vorkink of counsel), for appellant. Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (John M. Castellano and Daniel Bresnahan of counsel; Julaine Gallo on the brief), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lasak, J.), rendered March 7, 2012, convicting him of criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention that the Supreme Court considered improper factors in imposing sentence is unpreserved for appellate review ( seeCPL 470.05 [2]; People v. Aviles, 87 A.D.3d 547, 927 N.Y.S.2d 788;People v. Garson, 69 A.D.3d 650, 892 N.Y.S.2d 511).

The sentence imposed was not excessive ( see People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80, 455 N.Y.S.2d 675).

ENG, P.J., MASTRO, DICKERSON, LOTT and MILLER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Charles

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Oct 9, 2013
110 A.D.3d 824 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
Case details for

People v. Charles

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Bobby CHARLES, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Oct 9, 2013

Citations

110 A.D.3d 824 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 6586
971 N.Y.S.2d 895