From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Chaplin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 1, 1990
159 A.D.2d 209 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

March 1, 1990

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Bernard Jackson, J.).


Defendant was seen adjusting a weapon in the waistband of his trousers by two officers who were on routine patrol. When the officers exited their vehicle and called the defendant over, he fled. The officers arrested the defendant after a chase during which he discarded the weapon and his jacket. A suppression hearing was held on defendant's motion to suppress the gun and an incriminating statement made to police while in custody. The statement sought to be suppressed did not relate to the gun count but to the lesser count of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree, which was never reached by the jury in light of its finding of guilt on the felony gun possession charge.

The interrogating officer testified that following defendant's arrest he read the "Miranda warnings" to defendant from a printed card before defendant made the incriminating statement. At the hearing, however, at which his "Miranda card" was not used, the officer in his recital omitted one of the warnings. The court credited the officer's testimony that he had read a complete set of the "Miranda warnings" from his card to defendant following the arrest. In the absence of any showing whatsoever, either in the motion papers seeking the hearing or at the hearing, that the officer's communication to the defendant of the various "Miranda warnings" at the time of arrest was or might have been deficient, there is no basis upon which to disturb the hearing court's finding that defendant was, in fact, fully apprised of those rights prior to making the incriminating statement. (Cf., People v Gonzalez, 55 N.Y.2d 720, 722.)

We find no merit to appellant's arguments regarding the propriety of the People's summation which was responsive to the issues raised in defense counsel's summation. (See, People v Morgan, 66 N.Y.2d 255, cert denied 476 U.S. 1120; People v Galloway, 54 N.Y.2d 396, 399.)

Concur — Kupferman, J.P., Carro, Milonas, Ellerin and Rubin, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Chaplin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 1, 1990
159 A.D.2d 209 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

People v. Chaplin

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ANTHONY CHAPLIN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 1, 1990

Citations

159 A.D.2d 209 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
552 N.Y.S.2d 20

Citing Cases

People v. Dunkley

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County, Donald Zimmerman, J., Jack Rosenberg, J. Since the first officer…