From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Chandler

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 5, 1986
120 A.D.2d 542 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Opinion

May 5, 1986

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Zelman, J.).


Judgment reversed, on the law and as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, new trial ordered on the charge of robbery in the first degree, and the count of the indictment charging the defendant with assault in the third degree dismissed.

The most important issue in this case was the identity of the perpetrator, an issue on which conflicting testimony was elicited. Nevertheless, the trial court failed to give any charge whatsoever on identification. Although the defendant failed to take exception, we exercise our discretion and order a new trial on the charge of robbery in the first degree in the interest of justice (see, United States v Wade, 388 U.S. 218; People v Whalen, 59 N.Y.2d 273; People v Hollis, 106 A.D.2d 462; People v McKenzie, 97 A.D.2d 774; People v Daniels, 88 A.D.2d 392; 1 CJI [NY] 10.00 pp 575-605).

With respect to the assault charge, one of the People's witnesses testified that he was struck on the head with a gun. However, the blow did not cause him to lose consciousness, fall down, seek medical treatment, or suffer aftereffects. The People produced no further evidence concerning the injury. The bare proof that a victim has suffered a blow, without more, is insufficient to establish "substantial pain" within the meaning of Penal Law § 10.00 (9) and § 120.00 (see, People v Rojas, 61 N.Y.2d 726; People v Francis, 112 A.D.2d 167). Consequently, the assault count must be dismissed.

For the above reasons, a new trial is required on the charge of robbery in the first degree only. Mangano, J.P., Niehoff, Rubin and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Chandler

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 5, 1986
120 A.D.2d 542 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)
Case details for

People v. Chandler

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. OTTO CHANDLER…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 5, 1986

Citations

120 A.D.2d 542 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Citing Cases

People v. Bronson

This evidence, among other proof, clearly distinguishes this case from those in which we have found a new…

People v. Oquendo

Thus, it has been held that such minor injuries as a one-centimeter cut above the lip (People v. Jimenez, 55…