From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Chandler

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Dec 26, 2019
178 A.D.3d 639 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)

Opinion

10673 Ind. 548/17

12-26-2019

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Christopher CHANDLER, Defendant–Appellant.

Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Jan Hoth of counsel), for appellant. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Diana Wang of counsel), for respondent.


Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Jan Hoth of counsel), for appellant.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Diana Wang of counsel), for respondent.

Friedman, J.P., Webber, Kern, Moulton, JJ.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Ellen N. Biben, J. at request for new counsel; Robert M. Mandelbaum, J. at jury trial and sentencing), rendered September 18, 2017, convicting defendant of attempted assault in the first degree and two counts of assault in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second violent felony offender, to an aggregate term of 15 years, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v. Danielson, 9 N.Y.3d 342, 348–349, 849 N.Y.S.2d 480, 880 N.E.2d 1 [2007] ). There is no basis for disturbing the jury's credibility determinations. The evidence disproved defendant's justification defense beyond a reasonable doubt.

The court properly denied defendant's eve-of-trial request for new counsel, in support of which defendant's only specific allegation was that counsel had not obtained a prison surveillance videotape of an alleged prior attack on defendant by the victim. The court made appropriate inquiry, which revealed that the Department of Correction had destroyed the video (ultimately resulting in a adverse inference charge at trial), and there was nothing to suggest any deficiency in defense counsel's performance (see People v. Porto, 16 N.Y.3d 93, 99–100, 917 N.Y.S.2d 74, 942 N.E.2d 283 [2010] ). Defendant's suggestion that his application raised other specific concerns warranting further inquiry finds no support in the record of the colloquy on substitution of counsel.


Summaries of

People v. Chandler

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Dec 26, 2019
178 A.D.3d 639 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
Case details for

People v. Chandler

Case Details

Full title:The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Christopher Chandler…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Dec 26, 2019

Citations

178 A.D.3d 639 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
112 N.Y.S.3d 502
2019 N.Y. Slip Op. 9393