From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Chambliss

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 8, 1985
110 A.D.2d 707 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Opinion

April 8, 1985

Appeal from the County Court, Westchester County (Ritter, J.).


Judgment affirmed.

Based upon the record at bar, we find that defendant's statement to the police the morning after his arrest was made after he knowingly and voluntarily waived his Miranda rights. There was no evidence that the delay between defendant's arrest and his arraignment was unwarranted. Moreover, such factor is but one of several bearing upon the question of voluntariness of an inculpatory statement ( People v. Dairsaw, 46 N.Y.2d 739, cert denied 440 U.S. 985). Further, the court gave a lengthy and thorough instruction to the jury regarding this issue ( cf. People v. Lovello, 1 N.Y.2d 436; People v. Vann, 54 A.D.2d 356).

We have reviewed defendant's remaining contentions and find them also to be without merit. Mangano, J.P., Brown, Niehoff and Lawrence, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Chambliss

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 8, 1985
110 A.D.2d 707 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)
Case details for

People v. Chambliss

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. WAYNE CHAMBLISS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 8, 1985

Citations

110 A.D.2d 707 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)