Opinion
C089342
12-13-2019
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. JERARDO CHAIREZ, Defendant and Appellant.
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. (Super. Ct. No. 17FE019048)
Defendant Jerardo Chairez was charged with one count of stalking, one count of carrying a concealed dirk or dagger, and one count of possession of burglary tools. Defendant pled no contest to carrying a concealed dirk or dagger upon his person. In exchange for defendant's plea, the trial court suspended imposition of sentence and placed defendant on five years' probation; the remaining counts were dismissed. Among the conditions of probation, the court ordered defendant to serve 150 days in jail with custody credit for 65 days. The court imposed a restitution fine in the amount of $300 and a $40 court security assessment fee.
Subsequently, a petition for revocation of probation was filed for failing to notify the probation officer of a change of address. Defendant admitted the violation in exchange for a sentence of 30 days in jail. A second petition for revocation of probation was filed for failing to report to the probation department. Defendant admitted the violation in exchange for a sentence of 60 days in jail. A third petition for revocation of probation was filed for failure to obey all laws. The trial court terminated probation and defendant admitted the violation in exchange for a sentence of three years in jail with custody credit for 397 days.
DISCUSSION
We appointed counsel to represent defendant on appeal. Counsel filed an opening brief that sets forth the facts and procedural history of the case and requests this court to review the record to determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Defendant was advised by counsel of his right to file a supplemental brief within 30 days from the date the opening brief was filed. More than 30 days have elapsed, and defendant has not filed a supplemental brief. Having undertaken an examination of the entire record pursuant to Wende, we find no arguable error that would result in a disposition more favorable to defendant. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment.
DISPOSITION
The judgment is affirmed.
/s/_________
Robie, Acting P. J. We concur: /s/_________
Mauro, J. /s/_________
Duarte, J.