From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Cervi

COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SIX
Aug 30, 2012
2d Crim. No. B236338 (Cal. Ct. App. Aug. 30, 2012)

Opinion

2d Crim. No. B236338

08-30-2012

THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. TOR L. CERVI, Defendant and Appellant.

Jolene Larimore, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.


NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

(Super. Ct. No. F451380)

(San Luis Obispo County)

Tor L. Cervi appeals an order of probation granted after he expressly waived his trial rights and constitutional rights and pleaded nolo contendere to grand theft. (Pen. Code, § 487, subd. (a).) The trial court suspended imposition of sentence and placed Cervi on formal probation for three years. Terms and conditions of probation included 150 days of confinement in county jail, payment of various fines and fees, and payment of victim restitution.

On September 20, 2011, the trial court ordered Cervi to pay $1,522.90 in restitution, based upon the replacement cost of computer equipment taken from the victim's residence.

We appointed counsel to represent Cervi in this appeal. After counsel's examination of the record, she filed an opening brief raising no issues.

On June 25, 2012, we advised Cervi by mail that he had 30 days within which to personally submit any contentions or issues that he wished to raise on appeal. On July 11, 2012, the letter was returned as undeliverable.

We have reviewed the entire record and are satisfied that Cervi's attorney has fully complied with her responsibilities and that no arguable issue exists. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 441.)

The judgment is affirmed.

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED.

GILBERT, P.J. We concur:

YEGAN, J.

PERREN, J.

Barry T. LaBarbera, Judge


Superior Court County of San Luis Obispo

Jolene Larimore, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.

No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.


Summaries of

People v. Cervi

COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SIX
Aug 30, 2012
2d Crim. No. B236338 (Cal. Ct. App. Aug. 30, 2012)
Case details for

People v. Cervi

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. TOR L. CERVI, Defendant and…

Court:COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SIX

Date published: Aug 30, 2012

Citations

2d Crim. No. B236338 (Cal. Ct. App. Aug. 30, 2012)